With regard to your observations about being able to write to your c:\dump folder.
Get app pool party panic windows#
The ApplicationPoolIdentity still needs to be able to read files from the windows system folders (otherwise how else would the worker process be able to dynamically load essential DLL's). On first glance this may look somewhat worrying, however the Users group has somewhat limited NTFS rights.įor example, if you try and create a folder in the C:\Windows folder then you'll find that you can't. The ApplicationPoolIdentity is assigned membership of the Users group as well as the IIS_IUSRS group. I am interested in finding out about the way the operating system and/or IIS allows these writes to take place, even though there appears to be no explicit file system access granted. If you want to limit this access, you can always run the application under Medium Trust.
Get app pool party panic full#
Please note that I understand this was probably done for the sake of convenience, since it would be a pain to grant a user access to every folder it needs to write to if you are running under Full Trust. So, taking all of that into account, how is write access granted to the "IIS APPPOOL\AppPoolName" user? The w3wp.exe process runs as this user, so what allows this user to write to a folder it doesn't seem to have explicit access to?
The "IIS APPPOOL\AppPoolName" user is by default a member of the IIS_IUSRS group.ApplicationPoolIdentity represents a Windows user account called "IIS APPPOOL\AppPoolName", which is created when the Application Pool is created, where AppPoolName is the name of the Application Pool.In IIS 7.5, the default Identity for an Application Pool is ApplicationPoolIdentity.My question is: using ASP.NET in IIS 7.5, how does IIS and/or the operating system allow the web application to write to a folder like C:\dump when running under full trust? How is it that I don't have to explicitly add write access for the application pool user (in this case ApplicationPoolIdentity)? Especially not anyone as impressionable and insecure as 12 year olds.Here's an issue with IIS 7.5 and ASP.NET that I've been researching and getting nowhere with. There's nothing wrong with s3x work but in no way should it be marketed to children. There's money everywhere and the majority of it is with the guy and his pool. It also glorifies s3x work in a way with it's heart decorated stairs and a platform that leads to a stripper pole. it will make them, boys and girls, think that they/ women are only worth something if their naked. This is a weird game for honestly anyone but especially young kids. and at the end she enters a gaurded pool where a guy who takes a picture of her is waiting. There's a side meter that shoots up saying "confident" "sexy" etc as she undresses more. The main point is to get the character to take her clothes off, avoid putting more on, potentially fight with older women and avoid women who are "hotter" than her because the hotter woman will "kill" her. Why is this 12+? Middle school aged kids should be playing this game, especially not young girls. PLEASE READ especially if you're a parentġst, I am 19, so this is coming from a young womans perspective.
0 kommentar(er)
